of these three models, the second id the most gripping in terms of a compelling tectonic expression. Although the contrast of the red and white makes it visually "pop," there is just a quality of space created in and around that could be nice to explore.
While your first scheme is well constructed and quite a nice piece of model, it is a bit derivative of a Calatrava-style approach. Given that you have not expressed an in-depth structure based approach, I would caution you to be cautious of going into this direction.
The third approach could be nice with a bit of development. To me it is demanding a computational based array of the massing and elements. If you are up for the challenge of approaching this parametrically with rhino and grasshopper, i would encourage you to go this route.
Models.jpg)
Models2.jpg)
Models3.jpg)
of these three models, the second id the most gripping in terms of a compelling tectonic expression. Although the contrast of the red and white makes it visually "pop," there is just a quality of space created in and around that could be nice to explore.
ReplyDeleteWhile your first scheme is well constructed and quite a nice piece of model, it is a bit derivative of a Calatrava-style approach. Given that you have not expressed an in-depth structure based approach, I would caution you to be cautious of going into this direction.
The third approach could be nice with a bit of development. To me it is demanding a computational based array of the massing and elements. If you are up for the challenge of approaching this parametrically with rhino and grasshopper, i would encourage you to go this route.